Mining ban stays if miners don’t cooperate: Apex courtAugust 19th, 2011 - 9:55 pm ICT by IANS
New Delhi, Aug 19 (IANS) The Supreme Court Friday said that unless the private miners co-operated in the reclamation and rehabilitation of the devastated mines in Aravalli ranges of Faridabad and Gurgaon district of Haryana, the ban on mining in the area would continue.
The apex court’s forest bench of Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia, Justice Aftab Alam and Justice Swatanter Kumar said that if miners do not co-operate (in the rehabilitation of mines devastated by reckless mining), then the ban will continue.
The court’s stand came when amicus curiae Ranjit Kumar told the court that miners were not willing to co-operate in the rehabilitation of the devastated mines and restoring the ecology of the area.
Noting that the miners were bound under the lease to contribute in the restoration of the mines, Ranjit Kumar told the court that till date, not one miner has approached the apex court-appointed Central Empowered Committee (CEC) on environmental matters with their reclamation and rehabilitation plans.
When senior counsel K.K. Venugopal, appearing for one of the miners, said that they have got a report prepared by an institution dealing with mines, the court said that in Lafarge case, it has decided that it won’t accept a report from a private institution.
The court said that names of experts to carry out the study would be suggested by Attorney General Goolam Vahanvati and the cost would be borne by the miners.
The court was holding a hearing on the CEC’s report.
The court was told that effort should be to first reclaim and rehabilitate the area which was degraded and destroyed by illegal and uncontrolled mining. Ranjit Kumar told the court that there should be blanket ban on mining activities till the existing mines are rehabilitated.
As Haryana sought the court’s nod for starting mining activity on 600 hectares of land in Aravalli ranges, Venugopal said that no such permission could be given to the state government as 170 hectares of land was under lease and remaining land was under plantation and could not be released for mining.
Senior counsel Gopal Subramanium, who appeared for Haryana, said that there can be no reclamation of the mines as in geological activities, no one can go back to the original position. He said that these mines could only be rehabilitated by planting trees.
The court then adjourned the matter, giving an opportunity to the private miners to sit with state representatives before the CEC to formulate a rehabilitation plan for the mines.
- Supreme Court bans mining in Karnataka's Tumkur, Chitradurga - Aug 26, 2011
- Apex court approves reclamation of Karnataka mines - Apr 13, 2012
- Apex court approves reclamation of Karnataka mines (Lead) - Apr 14, 2012
- Karnataka to re-open eight iron ore mines soon - Jul 05, 2012
- Iron ore mining set to resume in Karnataka (Lead) - Jul 05, 2012
- CBI probe recommended against Yeddyurappa kin (Lead) - Apr 20, 2012
- No resumption of Karnataka mining without rehabilitation: Apex court - Aug 17, 2012
- SC lifts ban on 18 iron ore mines in Karnataka (Lead) - Sep 03, 2012
- SC asks CBI to probe if Yeddyurappa kin got kickbacks (Lead) - May 11, 2012
- SC lifts ban on iron ore mining for Karnataka - Sep 03, 2012
- SC may allow some iron ore mining to resume in Karnataka - Aug 31, 2012
- What next for Bellary: Mother of all mining violations (Comment) - Apr 17, 2011
- What next for Bellary: Mother of all mining violations (Lead Comment, correcting name in para 15) - Apr 17, 2011
- Apex court asked to extend mining ban in Karnataka - Aug 19, 2011
- Apex court allows limited mining in Aravali ranges - Oct 08, 2009
Tags: aftab, alam, amicus, apex, apex court, blanket ban, cec, chief justice, environmental matters, faridabad, hectares, kapadia, lafarge, miners, nod, private institution, ranjit kumar, reclamation, rehabilitation plans, senior counsel