Global Warming Not A Hoax: Claims Climate Scientists

November 25th, 2009 - 6:46 pm ICT by GD ( 9 comments )

By Meena Kar
gbNov. 25 (THAINDIAN NEWS) Global warming emails that were hacked by some cyber criminals from the server of the East Anglia University has created a controversy in the recent days. Government representatives demanded neutral investigation of the case so that unbiased report of this email hacking comes to the surface. Hacking of emails has not only raised questions on the security of the emails but also have created speculations on some of the reports regarding the global warming issues. The emails that were circulated on the internet identified some facts related to global warming as a hoax, allegedly sources.

According to sources, Senator James Inhofe has criticized the scientists of Climate Research Unit after the emails and other documents related to global warming surfaced on the internet. Sources stated that the Senator has also threatened climate scientists for investigation. In his statement to the media, he said, “…if nothing happens in the next seven days when we go back into session a week from today that would change this situation, I will call for an investigation.”

Though the online circulation of the documents and messages from Climate Research Center has raised several controversies regarding the global warming issues, scientists who are the advocates of the issue, rejected the claims and said that Global warming is not a hoax. Amid the controversies and criticisms related to global warming, on Tuesday, climate scientists have released new reports related to global warming and have named it as “Copenhagen Diagnosis”. They are making necessary preparations to attend and make the ‘climate conference’ in Copenhagen a success.

Related Stories

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Posted in Environment |

9 Responses

  1. Sands Says:

    Of course since they were making their living out of selling man made global warming to the world, what did anyone expect them to say in public?
    A better check would be to see if they have sold off their green stocks, like so many others are racing to do.

  2. mij61 Says:

    The implications of these emails are enormous: They mean the IPCC is not a reliable source of science on global warming. And since the global movement to “do something” about global warming rests almost entirely on the IPCC’s claim to represent the “consensus” of climate science, that entire movement stands discredited.

    The release of these documents creates an opportunity for reporters, academics, politicians, and others who relied on the IPCC to form their opinions about global warming to stop and reconsider their position. The experts they trusted and quoted in the past have been caught red-handed plotting to conceal data, hide temperature trends that contradict their predictions, and keep critics from appearing in peer-reviewed journals. This is new and real evidence that they should examine and then comment on publicly.

    Will the state controlled media in the U.S. report this?

  3. david Says:

    Climate change is not a hoax claims SOME climate scientists. That is what the heading should have read. I have two friends who are scientists and they and most of their constituants balk at climate change. What a joke.

  4. M Btok Says:

    http://www.charlesadler.com/2009/11/quotes-from-the-climategate-emails.htmlLondon’s Daily Telegraph has put together some quotes from the emails stolen from computers at the University of East Anglia.
    From: Phil Jones. To: Many. Nov 16, 1999
    “I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature [the science journal] trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years ( from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.
    From Phil Jones To: Michael Mann (Pennsylvania State University). July 8, 2004
    “I can’t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow — even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!” The IPCC is the UN body charged with monitoring climate change. The scientists did not want it to consider studies that challenge the view that global warming is genuine and man-made.
    From: Kevin Trenberth (US National Center for Atmospheric Research). To: Michael Mann. Oct 12, 2009
    “The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t… Our observing system is inadequate” Prof Trenberth appears to accept a key argument of global warming sceptics - that there is no evidence temperatures have increased over the past 10 years.
    From: Phil Jones. To: Many. March 11, 2003
    “I will be emailing the journal to tell them I’m having nothing more to do with it until they rid themselves of this troublesome editor.”
    Prof Jones appears to be lobbying for the dismissal of the editor of Climate Research, a scientific journal that published papers downplaying climate change.From Phil Jones. To: Michael Mann. Date: May 29, 2008
    “Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4? Keith will do likewise.” Climate change sceptics tried to use Freedom of Information laws to obtain raw climate data submitted to an IPCC report known as AR4. The scientists did not want their email exchanges about the data to be made public.
    From: Michael Mann. To: Phil Jones and Gabi Hegerl (University of Edinburgh). Date: Aug 10, 2004
    “Phil and I are likely to have to respond to more crap criticisms from the idiots in the near future.” The scientists make no attempt to hide their disdain for climate change
    sceptics who request more information about their work.

    Re: Comment: It will not “lower costs;” it will not “improve access;” it will not “improve quality.” It will raise taxes! Nothing is real in the cap-and-trade legislations. Nothing is real about the stimulus package. Nothing is real about the TARP bailout. All of it is fraudulent. It’s all a hoax perpetrated by the left knowing full well it’s a hoax, dressed up as something “compassionate” and an “emergency” required to save something, either jobs or the entire financial system of the world or whatever other threat will wipe us all out tomorrow if we don’t act tonight. It’s all a hoax! Everything the LEFTis behind today is a fraud and a lie aimed at separating you from three things: Your freedom, your property and your money.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VebOTc-7shU

  5. mij61 Says:

    What a joke. All of a sudden the alarmist’s scientist are releasing new reports related to global warming and have named it as “Copenhagen Diagnosis!

    I’m sure this material will be allowed debate from the skeptic side….NOT!

    These people are so terrified that people are finding out what a scam this is. They know this will and should lead to their demise.

  6. M Btok Says:

    These people are not only going to be dismissed from their employment but I hope they get good long prison sentences that they deserve!

    The reality of what is happening at Copenhagen is that the Elitists that are running the show in the United Nations and the IMF, don’t give a dam about the Climate! This was just an excuse to shut down democracies, take their money, take their properties, take their freedoms and de-industrialize their countries so that people are under their control and completely dependant on them the Elitists!

    People be prepared for a Revolution for us the people to keep our freedom! Should they win, we won’t have a life worth living! Really at that point we will have nothing to lose!

  7. TJC Says:

    Lie long enough and some people will believe it. There is no warming of the planet in fact there has been a global cooling in the past 20 years. I remember the Washington Post Newspaper gave a prize to a woman reporter about a kid that lived in the streets of Washington DC and the Mayor at the time (Barry) even said he knew the kid. Turned out it was all made up a total lie so I don’t belieive anything the news tells me!

  8. david russell Says:

    If the data from the largest, most prestigious source is called into question, how can anyone say that this doesn’t impact the case for AGW? Doesn’t that mean that the case CAN NOT BE BASED ON CLIMATE DATA. How credible is that?

  9. Birdzilla Says:

    Global warming is a hoax and a lie its being used by sinister persons to control our lives And these sinister people from the UN and CFR as well as the various eco-freak groups and as AL GORE

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.


RSS feed for comments on Global Warming Not A Hoax: Claims Climate Scientists