Lindsay Lohan’s mum backs her in “milkaholic” ad lawsuit
March 11th, 2010 - 2:58 pm ICT by ANI ( 1 comment )
London, Mar 11 (ANI): Lindsay Lohan’s mum Dina has jumped in to back her daughter’s multi-million pound legal battle over an advert which allegedly used the actress’ name and poked fun at her personal problems.
Lohan, 23, is seeking 66.7 million pounds in damages and compensation in connection with the promo for financial firm E-Trade, which depicted a baby girl called Lindsay as a boyfriend stealer and a “milkaholic”.
The ‘Mean Girls’ star filed a lawsuit against the advert, which aired on U.S. TV during the Super Bowl last month, on March 8 at Nassau County Supreme Court.
The actress’ lawyer, Stephanie Ovadia, alleges company bosses used Lohan’s “name and characterisation” without paying her or asking for her approval, thus violating her rights.
But chiefs at the advertising firm behind the commercial claim they chose the name Lindsay at random.
And now Dina has waded in to defend her daughter’s decision to sue, insisting the advert reduced the actress to tears during the Super Bowl celebrations.
She claims the actress called her after the Super Bowl “extremely upset”.
“She said, ‘Mommy, help me. This is wrong. How can they do this?’” the Daily Star quoted her as telling The New York Post.
Dina is adamant the commercial was aimed at her daughter - insisting the name Lindsay has as much recognition as other single-word monikers, used by stars such as Madonna and Cher.
“They’re little babies doing this, mocking another child who’s just trying to survive Hollywood, basically,” she said.
“I’m just basically glad I took a stand. I’m not going to let them do this to us anymore. Everyone knows Lindsay, like Cher or Madonna,” she added. (ANI)
- Lindsay files $100m lawsuit over 'boyfriend-stealing', 'milkaholic' baby ad - Mar 10, 2010
- Lindsay Lohan Sues E-Trade Over Milkaholic Baby Ad - Mar 10, 2010
- Lindsay Lohan Faces Yet Another Setback In A Span Of Two Days - Jul 09, 2010
- US firm fights back at LiLo's $100M lawsuit over 'milkaholic' baby ad - May 12, 2010
- LiLo settles $100m "Milkaholic" lawsuit - Sep 21, 2010
- LiLo suffers blow in her $40m lawsuit against E*Trade - Jul 09, 2010
- Lindsay Lohan sues E-trade for $100 million - Mar 10, 2010
- Lindsay Lohan demands $100 mn over 'milkaholic' ad - Mar 10, 2010
- Lindsay Lohan's Lawsuit Against E-Trade Moved To The City Of Their Headquarters - Jul 09, 2010
- Lindsay Lohan settles the e-trade lawsuit - Sep 22, 2010
- Lohans consult lawyers over movie spoof - Dec 30, 2010
- Lindsay Lohan to drop her surname - Mar 26, 2011
- The $100 Million Lawsuit Of Lindsay Lohan Against E-Trade Endures A Setback - Jul 09, 2010
- Lindsay Lohan dropping her last name - Mar 26, 2011
- Lindsay's dad hurt by name change news - Mar 29, 2011
Tags: advert, advertising firm, baby girl, characterisation, chiefs, company bosses, daily star, e trade, lindsay lohan, little babies, madonna, mean girls, mommy, nassau county, new york post, ovadia, personal problems, s tv, single word, super bowl
March 12th, 2010 at 10:41 am
Lindsay Lohan and mum are dillusional pieces of trash. Please, can somebody shut them up, because they are so ridiculous and the mum might be the biggest enabler and worst mum ever.