Court rules against sealing divorce case naming Springsteen as ‘other man’
April 15th, 2009 - 1:03 pm ICT by ANI
- New York, April 15 (ANI): A judge presiding over the bitter New Jersey divorce case naming Bruce Springsteen as the “other man” has said that the petition will not be sealed.
Arthur Kelly had filed papers in a court on grounds of adultery by Ann, his wife of 17 years, who, he claimed, cheated on him with the rocker.
In his legal documents, he had accused Ann of “committing adultery with Springsteen, who resides in Rumson, N.J. and Colts Neck, N.J. at various times and places too numerous to mention.”
Both Ann and the singer have denied the allegations.
And now, Superior Court Judge Patricia Roe, in a brief hearing in the Toms River courthouse, has rejected Ann’s plea for secrecy.
“Family Court is not unique in presiding over cases that involve enormous, personal embarrassment,” the New York Daily News quoted Roe as saying.
“Openness is the norm, not the exception. Mere embarrassment or a desire to avoid the potential criticism doesn’t suffice to make good cause,” she added. (ANI)
Sphere: Related ContentRelated Stories
- Springsteen's 'romance' with NJ woman was 'talk of town' - Apr 12, 2009
- Bruce Springsteen named the other man in divorce petition - Apr 09, 2009
- Springsteen's alleged lover hits back at 'lying' husband - May 22, 2009
- Bruce Springsteen denies cheating on wife - Apr 10, 2009
- Bruce Springsteen smooches wife onstage at gala tribute for Tom Hanks - Apr 29, 2009
- New Jersey woman denies Bruce Springsteen affair - Apr 11, 2009
- Bruce Springsteen's concert in the Giants stadium rocked - Oct 12, 2009
- Furious Bruce Springsteen slams ticket seller for tricking fans - Feb 24, 2009
- Springsteen slams Ticketmaster over Working on a Dream ticket sales - Feb 06, 2009
- Bruce Springsteen Turns 60 - Sep 23, 2009
Subscribe to Entertainment News in a reader
Posted in Entertainment, |
