Cheryl Cole’s L’Oréal ad ‘misleading’
November 22nd, 2009 - 1:56 pm ICT by ANI ( 1 comment )London, No 22 (ANI): A L’Oréal advert fronted by Cheryl Cole is at the centre of a row after viewers accused the X Factor judge of misleading them.
Cole, 26, appears in a television ad in which she sings the praises of L’Oréal Elvive Full Restore 5, a shampoo and conditioner range.
Thirteen viewers have complained to the Advertising Standards Authority about the commercial because Cole wears hair extensions.
The authority, however, rejected the claims as a message is shown during the advert, which says that Cole’s hair is “styled with some natural extensions”.
“A problem would only arise if the ad did not make clear that she is wearing these extensions. It is also worth noting that the hair extensions are made from natural hair and have been treated with the products being advertised,” Times Online quoted the watchdog as saying.
However, Cole’s hairdresser Julien Guyonnet has reportedly revealed that she uses artificial fibre extensions because the glue used for natural ones was damaging her hair.
He said: “She is very nice and down-to-earth. She didn’t tell me she was doing the adverts. She used to use human hair but the glue damaged her hair. Of course, she may have used human hair for a photoshoot depending on the hairdresser on the shoot and what company it was for.”
A L’Oréal spokesperson said she did not know whether Cole used artificial extensions, but added: “Cheryl has worn hair extensions for some time. They are part of her look and are cared for in the same way as normal hair.”
Meanwhile, Cole’s representative said: “L’Oréal are within their rights and the ads are not breaking any rules. We would never comment on what type of hair extensions Cheryl is using because these are quite personal questions.” (ANI)
- Cheryl Cole's L'Oreal hair products ad escapes the chop - Jun 02, 2010
- Cheryl Cole's endorsement sends hairspray sales soaring - Aug 09, 2010
- Bollywood celebrity "wars" go international - Jan 11, 2011
- L'Oréal found guilty of racial discrimination over snub to black, Asian, Arab salesgirls - Jun 25, 2009
- 'Dangerous' hair extensions should be banned, say UK experts - Feb 07, 2010
- Gerald Butler Becomes The L'Oreal Paris Men's Expert - Jul 31, 2010
- Now, sugar-coated tablet to iron out wrinkles - Dec 20, 2009
- Millionairess Cheryl Cole won't mind cheap clothes - Nov 01, 2010
- Cheryl is fourth richest young musician - Apr 24, 2010
- Cheryl Cole Criticized For Miming Live Performance - Oct 27, 2010
- Tips to improve hair health and appearance - Feb 06, 2011
- Cheryl Cole becomes an international beauty model - Sep 28, 2009
- 'Sexy' sumos pose in new advert for Japanese car manufacturer - Feb 19, 2011
- Beyonce's raunchy perfume ad branded 'too hot for kids' - Nov 17, 2010
- Easy ways to get rid of hair problems this monsoon - Jun 28, 2010
Tags: advert, advertising standards authority, adverts, cheryl cole, down to earth, glue, hair extensions, hairdresser, human hair, julien, london, natural extensions, natural hair, personal questions, photoshoot, praises, shampoo and conditioner, spokesperson, watchdog, x factor
June 4th, 2010 at 2:33 am
this advert was unjustly criticized by these mary whitehouses who complianed about tv in general and it was an dissgracefull attack on cheryl cole
who was paid to say the wonders that this new advanced shampoo can do to your hair and my findings in this case there was nothing wrong with the advert
and i followed the enclosure stating it had hair extensions
an d the advert should remain on tv not pulled off end of story.
frankie smales
(frankie smales movie and tv review uk)