Cher sues Universal Music Group over unpaid royaltiesJune 3rd, 2009 - 5:16 pm ICT by ANI
Melbourne, June 3 (ANI): Music legend Cher has sued Universal Music Group over 5-million-dollars in royalties allegedly owed to her and late ex-husband Sonny Bono.
The ‘Believe’ hitmaker filed the lawsuit in Los Angeles Superior Court, claiming the label’s bosses “engaged in wrongful tactics” to hide money owed to her from two compilation albums.
Cher claims two previous contracts with UMG predecessors - with MCA division Kapp Records in 1972 and a 1987 deal with the David Geffen Company - entitled her to receive up to 50 per cent of net royalties received by UMG.
The 1972 deal also included her then husband Bono. The pair divorced in 1975 and agreed to split the revenue from the songs they recorded together, reports The Daily Telegraph.
After Bono’s death in a 1998 skiing accident, his share of the royalties passed to his fourth wife, Mary, and his children.
The singer alleges UMG executives made a deal with Warner Music U.K. to distribute a 1999 compilation Cher The Greatest Hits - and concealed the amount of royalties owed to her, and Bono’s heirs.
Cher also challenges accounting on a second record, 2002’s The Very Best of Cher.
The suit states, “Instead of reporting to and paying plaintiffs their share of the revenues generated by Warner U.K., UMG Recordings, in an egregious example of self-dealing, apparently inserted Universal International as a middleman in the transaction… for the sole purpose of diverting money that rightfully belonged to plaintiffs to Universal International.
“UMG Recordings is underreporting and underpaying the royalties due to plaintiffs based on UMG Recordings’ improperly accounting to plaintiffs based on a royalty rate instead of their respective shares of net receipts.”
Cher also claims UMG chiefs improperly deducted 328,662 dollars in television advertising expenses, and that more money is owed from 2004 through to 2008.
The star’s lawyer, Mark Passin, says, “Universal is playing a game of catch-me-if-you-can with one of the most popular and iconic artists of all time. Unfortunately, record companies have learned over the years that they can increase their bottom line by underreporting royalties to artists.”
However, UMG spokesperson Peter Lofrumento has spoken out against the lawsuit: “The claims are meritless, and we are confident that we will prevail in court.” (ANI)
- Bob Marley family loses copyright fight with Universal Music Group - Sep 15, 2010
- Black Eyed Peas in legal soup over 'I Gotta Feeling', 'Boom Boom Pow' - Oct 30, 2010
- Priyanka Chopra breaks musical grounds internationally - Aug 05, 2011
- Lady Gaga settles legal feud with her ex - Sep 11, 2010
- Madonna collaborator sued over $10m worth of royalties - Dec 21, 2010
- Cher to marry Medvetz soon? - Aug 22, 2012
- Ellen DeGeneres' talkshow in copyright lawsuit - Sep 11, 2009
- Eminem's publisher suing Apple over 93 songs download - Sep 23, 2009
- FM channels ecstatic, musicians upset after Mumbai court verdict - Jul 27, 2011
- Britney being sued for $10M by former business partners - Mar 31, 2011
- Go, rule the music world: Bollywood tells Priyanka - Aug 05, 2011
- Cher loves men with great sense of humour - Dec 18, 2010
- Britney Spears Sued by Nanny for $35,000 in Unpaid Wages - Oct 04, 2010
- X-factor finalist Cher's dad Darren Lloyd sells her pictures on eBay - Nov 29, 2010
- Royalty issue: Composers displeased with verdict - Aug 02, 2011
Tags: angeles superior court, compilation albums, daily telegraph, david geffen company, egregious example, heirs, los angeles superior court, middleman, music legend, passin, plaintiffs, royalty rate, sonny bono, television advertising, umg recordings, universal international, universal music group, unpaid royalties, warner music, wife mary