2012 Movie Review
November 13th, 2009 - 1:54 am ICT by admin ( 15 comments )By Greg Jorgensen
** out of *****
Let’s face it – we’d be hard-pressed to find anyone who goes to see Roland Emerich’s new disaster opus expecting a tight story, plot twists or a deep investment in character development. People go to see these types of movies for the same reason shows like Destroyed in Seconds are hits – the base desire in all humans to watch scenes of mass destruction in all their horrible glory. Emerich and Co. certainly deliver in that sense, but in nearly all other aspects of filmmaking, 2012 is an utter failure, albeit a really pretty one.
Keep in mind that I loved the mindless escapism of films like Armageddon, Independence Day and Transformers (the first and last being made by the other specialist of mass-destruction fetishism, Michael Bay), but where they had a goofy charm, lowbrow humor, and a single – dare I say focused – aspect of Man vs. _______ (meteor, aliens, robot aliens), 2012 lacks this humor and charm, and tries to bludgeon us over the head with every natural disaster known to man. It’s a case of too much of a good thing and the result is pixilated overkill.
Following a ten-minute pre-credit sequence where we learn that neutrons have “mutated” (whatever that means) and are heating up the Earth’s core, we are introduced to the two main characters: Jackson Curtis (John Cusack), a single father juggling his ex-wife, two kids and a failed career as an author, and Adrian Helmsley (Chiwetel Ejiofor), a White House-connected geologist who helps make the initial discovery. The movie essentially cuts back and forth between the worlds and characters that surround each of these men, Curtis as he tries to save his family, and Helmsley as he tries to save humanity, or, as much of it as he can in the face of the entire planet cracking apart.
A commonly heard gripe among critics, audiences and scriptwriters is that without a coherent story, all the special effects in the world aren’t going to save you. Fair enough, but Emerich is either completely oblivious to this fact or brave enough to give it a big, sloppy kiss. I’ve pretty much covered the bases in terms of story, so let’s talk about the effects, which 2012’s entire publicity campaign was built around.
Actually, on second thought, I’m not going to discuss them. I think that we’re far enough into the 21st century that having great special effects is kind of a non-event. I mean, which disaster movie doesn’t have great effects these days? We’ve gotten to the point now where the phrase “the effects were so good!” has lost much of its meaning. To be sure, all of the floods, volcanoes, fireballs, collapsing buildings, explosions and earthquakes in 2012 look great; they’re just nothing new. They may be bigger and more frequent than we’re used to, but that alone doesn’t make a movie shine.
Scriptwise, it’s a train wreck. Clumsy exposition, bad accents and some of worst lines of dialogue I’ve heard in years kept my eyes rolling around like bowling balls on tournament night. The laws of physics, gravity and continuity are gleefully tossed aside – witness Curtis literally outrunning (as in, on foot) a catastrophic shockwave of fire and rock that just destroyed most of the west coast of the United States. Cusack’s charm and Ejiofor’s earnest delivery manage to hold the viewer’s interest, but in the face of such overwhelming destruction, it’s like trying to listen to an iPod next to a jet engine.
I’m not sure why this movie was released during the Christmas season – usually big-budget effects driven flicks like this are unleashed during the summer. Maybe it was because there aren’t any other effects driven flicks to compete with? At any rate, the trailer shows you many of the money shots. Indeed, as I sat down in the theater I asked myself ‘I wonder if I could write this review without actually seeing the movie.’ Turns out, I could probably have pulled it off. Watch the trailer – if that looks like something you’d like to watch for 2.5(!) hours, by all means head to the cinema. If not, skip it.
2012 Trailer:-
Greg Jorgensen has been scouring the back alleys and lurking in the movie theaters of Bangkok since 2001. His biggest regret is getting a Gold Class ticket for Star Wars Episode 2: Attack of the Clones.
- 2012 gets mixed reviews - Nov 13, 2009
- Disaster flick '2012' gets mixed reviews - Nov 14, 2009
- 2012 movie releases tomorrow - Nov 13, 2009
- 'Woman in Black' trailer released - Apr 13, 2011
- 2010 Oscar Predictions: Best Supporting Actress - Feb 25, 2010
- High Hopes On 'Little Fockers' - Nov 13, 2010
- 2010 Oscar Predictions: Best Picture - Feb 24, 2010
- 2010 Oscar Predictions: Best Actress - Feb 25, 2010
- 2010 Oscar Predictions: Best Supporting Actor - Feb 25, 2010
- 2010 Oscar Predictions: Best Actor - Feb 25, 2010
- Jason Segal wants to play 'bad guy' role - Jun 13, 2011
- 2010 Oscar Predictions: Best Director - Feb 25, 2010
- Sarah Palin's documentary lacks audience - Jul 26, 2011
- Mary J Blige to portray Justice Charlier in 'Rock of Ages' - Jul 21, 2011
- "2012": Following On The Footsteps Of The Mayan Predictions - Oct 02, 2009
Tags: character development, chiwetel ejiofor, coherent story, credit sequence, escapism, geologist, goofy charm, helmsley, initial discovery, john cusack, meteor, michael bay, natural disaster, neutrons, plot twists, roland emerich, scriptwriters, single father, story plot, utter failure
November 13th, 2009 at 2:14 am
pls dont tell me that… i just bought tickets for the 1st day 1st show :(
November 14th, 2009 at 10:20 am
u dont no how 2 give review.. :P
November 14th, 2009 at 10:18 pm
I took my 12 yr old son and 19 yr old daughter to see it and despite a few lame script choices such as the presidents last words (which reminded me of Fred Sanford in Sanford and son)we agreed that it was edge of our seat action. Which is what we expected. I also thought Woody H. Played a great nut job.
November 14th, 2009 at 11:05 pm
its true that in 2012 whole earth will smashes…..by seeing trailers the movie is excellent…..
November 15th, 2009 at 4:54 am
At least Michael Bay will try to develop a character or two.. Worst movie ever.
November 15th, 2009 at 7:01 am
wow nice… i will see this noon
November 17th, 2009 at 9:40 pm
Super duber flop. if things like tat is going to happen no one on earth will survive . :)
November 21st, 2009 at 12:36 am
i agree with Greg Jorgensen never watched such a worst movie in my life.
November 21st, 2009 at 8:32 pm
who do you do you think you are director of 2012 are you god no so dont say the world will end in 2012 f*** you actors of 2012 you are super stupid
November 21st, 2009 at 8:37 pm
you are all the bad things you are toilet and garbage and stupid and the a f b c word and donkeys
December 6th, 2009 at 9:33 pm
try to watch how bad it is. :-)
December 8th, 2009 at 4:59 pm
at least before making movie…u should read the law o physics….if polar change there places that will effect satellite position….and in this movie , makers will forget all the law of science
January 14th, 2010 at 11:56 am
oh come on you ppl. its just a movie. it was only created to show wats in the prophecy. it is you own will if you are going to believe it or not!!!
January 22nd, 2010 at 4:00 am
moive sucks
January 22nd, 2010 at 4:05 am
dont belive it :)