Aishwarya

2012 Movie Review

November 13th, 2009 - 1:54 am ICT by admin ( 15 comments )

By Greg Jorgensen
** out of *****

2012 movie poster Let’s face it – we’d be hard-pressed to find anyone who goes to see Roland Emerich’s new disaster opus expecting a tight story, plot twists or a deep investment in character development. People go to see these types of movies for the same reason shows like Destroyed in Seconds are hits – the base desire in all humans to watch scenes of mass destruction in all their horrible glory. Emerich and Co. certainly deliver in that sense, but in nearly all other aspects of filmmaking, 2012 is an utter failure, albeit a really pretty one.

Keep in mind that I loved the mindless escapism of films like Armageddon, Independence Day and Transformers (the first and last being made by the other specialist of mass-destruction fetishism, Michael Bay), but where they had a goofy charm, lowbrow humor, and a single – dare I say focused – aspect of Man vs. _______ (meteor, aliens, robot aliens), 2012 lacks this humor and charm, and tries to bludgeon us over the head with every natural disaster known to man. It’s a case of too much of a good thing and the result is pixilated overkill.

Following a ten-minute pre-credit sequence where we learn that neutrons have “mutated” (whatever that means) and are heating up the Earth’s core, we are introduced to the two main characters: Jackson Curtis (John Cusack), a single father juggling his ex-wife, two kids and a failed career as an author, and Adrian Helmsley (Chiwetel Ejiofor), a White House-connected geologist who helps make the initial discovery. The movie essentially cuts back and forth between the worlds and characters that surround each of these men, Curtis as he tries to save his family, and Helmsley as he tries to save humanity, or, as much of it as he can in the face of the entire planet cracking apart.

A commonly heard gripe among critics, audiences and scriptwriters is that without a coherent story, all the special effects in the world aren’t going to save you. Fair enough, but Emerich is either completely oblivious to this fact or brave enough to give it a big, sloppy kiss. I’ve pretty much covered the bases in terms of story, so let’s talk about the effects, which 2012’s entire publicity campaign was built around.

Actually, on second thought, I’m not going to discuss them. I think that we’re far enough into the 21st century that having great special effects is kind of a non-event. I mean, which disaster movie doesn’t have great effects these days? We’ve gotten to the point now where the phrase “the effects were so good!” has lost much of its meaning. To be sure, all of the floods, volcanoes, fireballs, collapsing buildings, explosions and earthquakes in 2012 look great; they’re just nothing new. They may be bigger and more frequent than we’re used to, but that alone doesn’t make a movie shine.

Scriptwise, it’s a train wreck. Clumsy exposition, bad accents and some of worst lines of dialogue I’ve heard in years kept my eyes rolling around like bowling balls on tournament night. The laws of physics, gravity and continuity are gleefully tossed aside – witness Curtis literally outrunning (as in, on foot) a catastrophic shockwave of fire and rock that just destroyed most of the west coast of the United States. Cusack’s charm and Ejiofor’s earnest delivery manage to hold the viewer’s interest, but in the face of such overwhelming destruction, it’s like trying to listen to an iPod next to a jet engine.

I’m not sure why this movie was released during the Christmas season – usually big-budget effects driven flicks like this are unleashed during the summer. Maybe it was because there aren’t any other effects driven flicks to compete with? At any rate, the trailer shows you many of the money shots. Indeed, as I sat down in the theater I asked myself ‘I wonder if I could write this review without actually seeing the movie.’ Turns out, I could probably have pulled it off. Watch the trailer – if that looks like something you’d like to watch for 2.5(!) hours, by all means head to the cinema. If not, skip it.

2012 Trailer:-

Greg Jorgensen has been scouring the back alleys and lurking in the movie theaters of Bangkok since 2001. His biggest regret is getting a Gold Class ticket for Star Wars Episode 2: Attack of the Clones.

Related Stories

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Posted in Entertainment |

15 Responses

  1. Vaibhav Dugar Says:

    pls dont tell me that… i just bought tickets for the 1st day 1st show :(

  2. Vikalp singh Says:

    u dont no how 2 give review.. :P

  3. LeoSan816 Says:

    I took my 12 yr old son and 19 yr old daughter to see it and despite a few lame script choices such as the presidents last words (which reminded me of Fred Sanford in Sanford and son)we agreed that it was edge of our seat action. Which is what we expected. I also thought Woody H. Played a great nut job.

  4. sanjana Says:

    its true that in 2012 whole earth will smashes…..by seeing trailers the movie is excellent…..

  5. Pave Says:

    At least Michael Bay will try to develop a character or two.. Worst movie ever.

  6. Pavan Somu Says:

    wow nice… i will see this noon

  7. Junkie Says:

    Super duber flop. if things like tat is going to happen no one on earth will survive . :)

  8. rajesh Says:

    i agree with Greg Jorgensen never watched such a worst movie in my life.

  9. hana Says:

    who do you do you think you are director of 2012 are you god no so dont say the world will end in 2012 f*** you actors of 2012 you are super stupid

  10. hana Says:

    you are all the bad things you are toilet and garbage and stupid and the a f b c word and donkeys

  11. weatherbottom Says:

    try to watch how bad it is. :-)

  12. kumar shalabh Says:

    at least before making movie…u should read the law o physics….if polar change there places that will effect satellite position….and in this movie , makers will forget all the law of science

  13. GaNtZ Says:

    oh come on you ppl. its just a movie. it was only created to show wats in the prophecy. it is you own will if you are going to believe it or not!!!

  14. john phal Says:

    moive sucks

  15. john phal Says:

    dont belive it :)

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.


RSS feed for comments on 2012 Movie Review