Why hide names of foreign account holders, asks apex court (Lead)
January 14th, 2011 - 6:26 pm ICT by IANSNew Delhi, Jan 14 (IANS) The Supreme Court Friday asked the central government what was its difficulty in disclosing the names of people who have stashed away huge amounts of money in Swiss and German banks in Liechtenstein principality in Europe.”What is the privilege” in not disclosing their names, asked the apex court bench of Justice B. Sudarshan Reddy and Justice S.S.Nijjar.
“It is not a case of tax. The issue involved is of serious nature. Keep aside all the things. Let us consider about the persons (those disclosed by the German authorities),” the court told Solicitor General Gopal Subramanium.
“If you don’t have them (the names), it is a different matter,” the court said, suggesting that when the government has the names, why cannot these be made public.
At this, Subramanium sought the adjournment of the hearing, saying that he needed to seek instructions from the government.
The matter will come up for hearing Wednesday.
In the course of the hearing, senior counsel Anil Diwan, appearing for petitioner Ram Jethmalani, said the government was deliberately not making the names public.
He said the government was going in a wrong direction by taking the cover of the double taxation treaty between India and Germany. The entire issue concerns black money, Diwan contended.
Jethamalani has moved the apex court seeking directions to the central government to act on the report that the German government was willing to share the details of Indians who were having accounts in the banks based in Liechtenstein.
Jethamalani has sought the court’s directions to the government to bring back ill-gotten $1.5 trillion put away in foreign banks by Indians.
The German government had said that it accessed the information on the details of the account holders through its sources.
The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), in its status report during last hearing of the case, said there are twelve trusts owned by 26 tax assesses, which even include NRIs, that hold accounts in the Swiss and German banks in Liechtenstein.
There are 15 banks in Liechtenstein, of which seven are Swiss. The principality, with an area of about 160 sq km, is surrounded by Switzerland and Austria and has a total population of 67,000 people.
- India's cabinet discusses how to bring black money back (Roundup) - Jan 20, 2011
- Black money: Apex court seeks details on government steps (Lead) - Jan 27, 2011
- Cabinet discusses black money issue after apex court rap - Jan 20, 2011
- Black money stashed abroad a national plunder: Supreme Court - Jan 19, 2011
- Indian money stashed abroad a national plunder: Apex court (Lead) - Jan 19, 2011
- Apex court appoints probe team on money laundering (Second Lead) - Jul 04, 2011
- Supreme Court ruling on money laundering probe Monday (Lead) - Jul 02, 2011
- Can't reveal names in black money cases, court told - Apr 21, 2011
- Black money trail: Use of tax agreement with Germany denied - Feb 09, 2011
- Mukherjee to clarify government stand on black money - Jan 24, 2011
- Names of 6 money launderers can be disclosed, Supreme Court told - Apr 15, 2011
- Supreme Court to hear black money issue - Feb 10, 2011
- Supreme Court appoints probe team on money laundering (Lead) - Jul 04, 2011
- Black money: Government to study court order - Jul 04, 2011
- Apex court ruling on money laundering probe Monday - Jul 02, 2011
Tags: adjournment, apex court, black money, central government, court bench, direct taxes, diwan, double taxation treaty, foreign banks, german authorities, german banks, german government, gopal, issue concerns, principality, ram jethmalani, senior counsel, solicitor general, sudarshan reddy, wrong direction