U.S. woman alleges that a bank took her house and parrot

March 10th, 2010 - 8:56 pm ICT by Pen Men At Work  

bank Mar 10 (Pen Men at Work): Angela Iannelli, 46, has taken legal action against the Bank of America in Allegheny County on Monday. She has pronounced that her mortgage expenditures were punctual when the contractor smashed the furniture, took her darling parrot and padlocked the entrance to her Allison Park home in October. She has stated that the bank took her house and parrot.

Bank of America had commanded Snyder Property Services to pierce, confiscate, padlock, winterize and take ownership of the woman’s home because they held it to be in default. The property service implemented the directions and turned off the water, ended the power supply, and crammed the drains with antifreeze. After the home was ransacked, the woman’s parrot was then removed from the home. The plaintiff has declared in her lawsuit that she persistently tried to call to state her claim over the bird but the Bank of America uttered to her to stop calling and disconnected the line because they were exhausted of hearing from her.

In the lawsuit, the woman asserts that the Bank of America was deliberately misleading and does not have the guiding principles to verify foreclosure validity or to impede an erroneous seizure from occurring. Spokespeople for Bank of America declined to comment on the Allegheny County lawsuit.

Bank of America, for some time, refrained itself from perpetrating further comments, clarifications and elaborations. The suit hunts for indeterminate indemnity.

Iannelli’s legal representative has asserted that she has put up with irremediable emotional and mental damage and is indescribably fearful of showing up in the house. The grievance expounds that she, in the end, salvaged ownership of the bird, named Luke, after recurring telephone calls to the bank.

However, some hours back, in an announcement, the bank has mouthed that it earnestly asks for forgiveness and has endeavored for months to solve the issue. The bank has adjudicated that it has nil lenience for this sort of erroneousness. The bank has pronounced that it will speedily assess the suit’s accusations and mull over any suffering that resulted.

Related Stories

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Posted in Business |