U.S. Supreme Court rules out discrimination class-action suit against Wal-Mart
June 21st, 2011 - 8:16 am ICT by BNO NewsWASHINGTON, D.C. (BNO NEWS) — The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday ruled in favor of Wal-Mart as a group of over 1 million employees had filed a class-action lawsuit against the nation’s largest retailer.
Around 1.5 million female Wal-Mart employees, both current and former, were seeking backpay due to damages as they alleged discriminatory practices by their employer. It was one of the the largest ever employee class-action lawsuits in U.S. history.
The group had claimed that local managers exercise their discretion over pay and promotions disproportionately in favor of men, which has an unlawful disparate impact on female employees; and that Wal-Mart’s refusal to cabin its managers’ authority amounts to disparate treatment.
However, on behalf of the majority, Justice Antonin Scalia said the “respondents provide no convincing proof of a companywide discriminatory pay and promotion policy,” concluding that “they have not established the existence of any common question.”
Furthermore, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed with Chief Judge Kozinski that the members of the group “held a multitude of different jobs, at different levels of Wal-Mart’s hierarchy, for variable lengths of time, in 3,400 stores, sprinkled across 50 states, with a kaleidoscope of supervisors (male and female), subject to a variety of regional policies that all differed. Some thrived while others did poorly. They have little in common but their sex and this lawsuit.”
With the ruling in favor of Wal-Mart, the group of female workers will be unable to sue the retailer in what would have been billions of dollars in losses. In addition, the Supreme Court said that the group’s claims for backpay were improperly certified.
Gisel Ruiz, Executive Vice President of People at Wal-Mart U.S., said the company was pleased with Monday’s ruling, adding that the Court had made the right decision. “Walmart has had strong policies against discrimination for many years. The Court today unanimously rejected class certification and, as the majority made clear, the plaintiffs’ claims were worlds away from showing a companywide discriminatory pay and promotion policy,” Ruiz stated.
“Walmart has a long history of providing advancement opportunities for our female associates and will continue its efforts to build a robust pipeline of future female leaders,” Ruiz added.
- Supreme Court to decide on Wal-Mart discrimination case soon - Mar 28, 2011
- Lawsuit against Wal-Mart To Go For A Trial - Apr 27, 2010
- Wal-Mart Appeals In Supreme Court - Aug 26, 2010
- Wal-Mart To Defend Against Gender Bias Lawsuit, Appeals Court Rules - Apr 27, 2010
- Wal-Mart's Extra Pay Policy For Sunday Coming To An End - Dec 09, 2010
- Wal-Mart Intends To Terminate Extra Pay For Its Employees Functioning On Sunday - Dec 09, 2010
- Wal-Mart all set to withdraw its extra pay scheme for Sundays - Dec 09, 2010
- Wal-Mart Intends To Execute $2 Billion Drive To Lessen Hunger - May 13, 2010
- Kentuckian Family Sues Wal-Mart After Sighting A Deceased Mouse In A Milk Container - Aug 19, 2010
- Wal-Mart to target 35,000 Indian farmers for agri-business supply chain by 2015 - Oct 26, 2010
- Wal-Mart Recalls 2.2 Million Heaters - Dec 18, 2010
- Wal-Mart Hit By Shoplifting Amidst Cyber Monday Sales Season - Nov 28, 2010
- Mexico probes Wal-Mart bribery allegations - Apr 27, 2012
- Wal-Mart to pay a fine of $27.6 million in the 'dumping case' - May 05, 2010
- Walmart Announces Plans to End Extra Sunday Pay - Dec 10, 2010
Tags: antonin scalia, bno, chief judge, class action lawsuit, class action lawsuits, class action suit, convincing proof, discriminatory practices, disparate impact, disparate treatment, female subject, judge kozinski, justice antonin scalia, local managers, promotion policy, regional policies, supreme court rules, variable lengths, wal mart, walmart