Uncommon furore over common brinjal
February 9th, 2010 - 9:16 pm ICT by IANS ( Leave a comment )New Delhi, Feb 9 (IANS) India’s decision Tuesday to place an indefinite moratorium on commercial cultivation of Bt Brinjal followed months of heated debate over the advantages and risks of growing the world’s first genetically modified vegetable.
Bt Brinjal is a transgenic variety of the vegetable, created by inserting a gene (Cry 1Ac) from the soil bacterium Bacillus thuringenisis (Bt) to brinjal. The insertion gives the plant resistance against pests like the brinjal fruit and shoot borer. On eating the bacterium Bt, the insect’s digestive processes are disrupted, ultimately resulting in death.
Supporters of the technology say it will reduce pesticide use and thus bring down input costs for farmers, while improving yields.
Opponents are principally worried on two counts — one, what happens if there is accidental cross-pollination between Bt and ordinary brinjal? Will the modified gene get into the other variety? What will the consequences be?
Two, what are the long-term effects of Bt Brinjal on human health, given that long-term trials have not been held? The product is too new for that.
Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh, who had to take the decision on the commercial release after the government Genetic Engineering Approval Committee (GEAC) had passed it last October, held a series of consultations with scientists, farmers and civil groups before reaching Tuesday’s decision.
He said the inadequacy of tests on long term health and environment impacts could not be ignored, and placed a moratorium pending further tests whose results would be available to all.
Ramesh said that in the past month, since he started public and private consultations on the issue, he had met around 8,000 people.
At the public meetings in Kolkata, Bhubaneswar, Hyderabad and Bangalore there was vociferous opposition. However small groups of farmers have said they are in favour of Bt Brinjal if it assures less dependence on pesticides.
The issue has also raised tempers in political circles. The agriculture and science and technology ministries had supported the commercial release of Bt Brinjal. Ramesh, on the other hand, wrote a sharp letter to Sharad Pawar after the agriculture minister said the government had no role left to play after the GEAC nod.
India is the world’s largest brinjal producer. West Bengal produces more than any other state, and the Left Front government there was one of 12 that had declared it would not allow commercial release of Bt Brinjal.
There are as many as 2,500 natural varieties of brinjals cultivated in India. The National Gene Bank here has accessions for nearly 3,550. Many of these also have medicinal value. The opponents are also worried because Bt Brinjal will carry no label since there are no labelling laws in the country for vegetables.
Another question raised time and again is why the GEAC had kept its test reports under wraps. The chairman had said that seed developers Mahyco wanted the information kept confidential in the “research and development stages”. This claim was severely critisised by global environmental group Greenpeace.
The moratorium declared by Ramesh is on the version of Bt Brinjal being developed by Mahyco. Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, the University of Agriculture in Dharwad (Karnataka) and two laboratories of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research are also developing genetically modified versions of brinjal.
So far, the only genetically modified crop cultivated commercially in India is Bt Cotton. It has had mixed reviews, but there is such a large area under its cultivation that India is now the sixth largest country growing genetically modified crops.
There are only 14 countries that cultivate GM food crops, according to the Centre for Sustainable Agriculture, near Hyderabad.
After Bt Brinjal, there are many more genetically modified food crops awaiting GEAC approval — 25 kinds of rice, 23 kinds of tomatoes, many types of groundnut, pigeon peas, potato, mustard, sugarcane, soy and okra.
- India is sharply divided over introduction of Bt Brinjal - Feb 09, 2010
- Explained: The ruckus over Bt Brinjal - Jan 30, 2010
- Canadian Indian scientist pats Ramesh on Bt Brinjal, smells conspiracy - Feb 15, 2010
- Hunger strike against cultivation of Bt Brinjal in Kerala - Jan 30, 2010
- 'Ban on Bt brinjal hurting Indian scientists' - Jan 26, 2011
- Baba Ramdev talks tough on BT brinjal issue - Jan 31, 2010
- Prime Minister to discuss Bt-brinjal issue - Feb 24, 2010
- No GM crop trials without states' consent: Jairam Ramesh - Mar 09, 2011
- State chiefs don't want hasty decision on Bt brinjal: Jairam Ramesh - Jan 28, 2010
- India says no to Bt Brinjal, pending tests (Second Lead) - Feb 09, 2010
- No decision on Bt Brinjal release before February (Roundup) - Oct 15, 2009
- Chief ministers influenced Ramesh's Bt Brinjal decision - Feb 09, 2010
- PMK fires salvo against Bt Brinjal - Oct 18, 2009
- India says 'no' to Bt Brinjal, pending scientific tests (Roundup) - Feb 09, 2010
- Monsanto to continue research on GM crops in India - Feb 10, 2010
Tags: bacillus, brinjal, civil groups, commercial cultivation, cross pollination, digestive processes, environment minister, furore, geac, inadequacy, input costs, jairam ramesh, long term health, moratorium, pesticide use, plant resistance, private consultations, series of consultations, soil bacterium, vociferous opposition