Supreme Court slaps Rs.10 lakh fine on frivolous litigant
February 2nd, 2011 - 10:27 pm ICT by IANSNew Delhi, Feb 2 (IANS) The Supreme Court Wednesday slapped an exemplary cost of Rs.10 lakh on an appellant for filing a frivolous litigation aimed at frustrating attempts to acquire his land for the Bangalore-Mysore road project.The litigant was penalised for embarking upon a second round of litigation on an issue identical to the earlier phase of court hearing.
The apex court bench of Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice A.K. Ganguly said the cost of Rs.10 lakh will be paid by appellant M. Nagabhushan to the Karnataka High Court Legal Services Society within a period of six weeks.
In case of default in payment, the apex court said the amount will be recovered from the appellant as arrears of land revenue.
Nagabhushan resorted to the second round of litigation after he failed in the apex court in his first appeal challenging the acquisition of his land for the 111-km four-lane Bangalore-Mysore Infrastructure Corridor Project (BMICP).
The “second round of litigation is misconceived inasmuch as the acquisition proceedings were upheld right up to this (apex court) court,” the court said, holding that it was an “attempt to litigate again”.
Speaking for the bench, Justice Ganguly described the second round of litigation as “an instance of abuse of the process of court”.
“It is obvious that such a litigative adventure by the present appellant is clearly against the principles of Res Judicata as well as the principles of Constructive Res Judicata and principles analogous thereto,” the judgment read.
The doctrine of Res Judicata implies that after an issue is raised before a competent court and a judgment is delivered, the verdict should be considered as final.
While dismissing the appeal with exemplary costs, the court directed the Karnataka government to complete the project as early as possible.
- Apex court questions Karnataka on road project - Jul 21, 2011
- Wary of frivolous cases, landlords keeping houses vacant: Court - Jul 09, 2011
- Use discretion to further ends of justice: Apex court - Nov 07, 2011
- Supreme Court bench again avoids Vedanta hearing - Jan 21, 2011
- 2G: Apex court examines review petitions (Lead) - Apr 03, 2012
- Supreme Court lifts gag order on Amar Singh tapes (Second Lead) - May 12, 2011
- State biggest land grabber, says Supreme Court - Jul 06, 2011
- Yamuna Expressway gets apex court nod (Lead) - Sep 08, 2010
- Apex court pulls up three states on vehicle number plates - Aug 31, 2011
- Apex court cautions high courts on use of powers - Nov 03, 2010
- Fair land takeover package will cut litigation: Apex court - May 24, 2011
- Land acquisition not at cost of fertile land : Sonia Gandhi - Sep 09, 2010
- Apex court query on river linking's viability - Oct 17, 2011
- Illegal mining a reality: Chief Justice Kapadia - Jul 24, 2011
- Karnataka asked to explain stand on Nice project - Jan 11, 2010
Tags: acquisition, apex, apex court, arrears, bangalore, competent court, corridor project, court bench, doctrine of res judicata, feb 2, frivolous litigation, ganguly, judgment, karnataka government, karnataka high court, lakh, litigant, New Delhi, proceedings, six weeks