Reliance Group complains to court about media reportsOctober 10th, 2011 - 11:32 pm ICT by IANS
New Delhi, Oct 10 (IANS) The Supreme Court Monday was told that media reports based on status reports submitted by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on its probe into the 2G case that three Reliance Group officials would turn approver had hit the fortunes of the company in the stock market.
The apex court bench of Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice Asok Kumar Ganguly was told that because of the media reports based on the court’s proceedings, the Reliance Communications shares dipped by 12.5 percent in the stock market which had hurt lakhs of its shareholders.
Senior counsel Mukul Rohtagi appearing for Reliance Communication said, “I am Reliance Communication. They (three officials) never said that they will become approvers.”
“No one has turned approver,” the court was told.
He said that all this happened when his client was not a party in the case.
As Rohtagi said this, the court said that “they (CBI) never said that they will become approver.”
Senior counsel K.K. Venugopal appearing for the investigating agency too said that “I have never said that they (three Reliance Group officials) will become approver.”
The three officials are Reliance Group managing director Gautam Doshi, group president Surendra Pipara and senior vice president Hari Nayar. They are currently in judicial custody for alleged involvement in 2G scam.
Rohtagi was referring to Sep 29 media reports on the day’s proceedings in the apex court.
Rohtagi submitted to the court that it has been told by the court that media would only report the orders of the court and not what transpired between the bench and the lawyers.
The court was told that the status report filed by the CBI should only be read by the court and investigating agency’s counsel should not read extracts from it.
When the court said that Venugopal only refers to certain paras of the status report, Rohtagi said that from it the media is able to draw its conclusion and make additions, substraction or add spice to its reports.
Describing the case being heard by the court as “peculiar”, Rohtagi said that it was “very difficult to stop media” but the reputation of the company had been dented and “we are damned”. He told the court, “I am really suffering.”
The court told the senior counsel that there were remedies available and he could take recourse to them. At this, Rohtagi said that he would move an application.
- Don't drag Chidambaram into 2G case, CBI tells apex court - Sep 20, 2011
- Laws violated, documents forged in 2G scam: Apex court (Lead) - Mar 15, 2011
- Apex court pulls up IT department for tardy 2G probe (Second Lead) - May 05, 2011
- Chidambaram favoured 2G auction, CBI tells apex court - Sep 29, 2011
- 2G scam: CBI points finger at Maran, seeks more time (Second Lead) - Jul 07, 2011
- Probe Chidambaram's role in 2G case: Swamy tells apex court (Lead) - Sep 08, 2011
- 2G case: Swamy gives apex court proof on Chidambaram's role (Lead) - Sep 21, 2011
- CBI will study Swamy's documents on Chidambaram, court told (Lead) - Sep 22, 2011
- 2G: CBI clears Chidambaram, to dig deeper into Swan deal - Sep 29, 2011
- Source of Radia tapes' leak unknown, court told (Lead) - Aug 23, 2012
- 2G scam: CBI points finger at Maran, seeks more time (Lead) - Jul 06, 2011
- 2G case: CBI opposes government on Swamy's plea - Sep 27, 2011
- Chidambaram overruled officials on 2G, apex court told - Apr 04, 2012
- 'So many zeroes...' Supreme Court raps tax department on 2G (Lead) - May 05, 2011
- Reliance Group officials' bail plea deferred - Sep 19, 2011
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,