Outsourcing may increase profits, but softens competition among rivals
January 11th, 2011 - 4:45 pm ICT by ANIWashington, Jan 11 (ANI): A new study has revealed that outsourcing certain aspects of a business to a third party may save a firm’s costs, but it softens the competition among industry rivals.
According to Yunchuan “Frank” Liu at University of Illinois and Rajeev Tyagi, an economist at the University of California at Irvine, outsourcing hurts society in two ways - lost jobs for workers and consumers paying higher prices than they should for goods.
“Outsourcing is a topic that affects just about everyone, and the general consensus is that it’s bad because American workers will lose jobs because of it,” he said.
“Most people only focus on the job-displacement angle, but very few people have questioned how it affects consumers and competition in the marketplace.”
“If a firm outsources production to a low-cost country, there’s a cost-saving effect, but there’s also a weakening among on the competition,” Liu said.
“If the competition is softened and the production costs become lower, businesses don’t have an incentive to pass those savings along to consumers,” Liu said.
“In some cases, consumers pay higher prices.”
Before the trend of outsourcing, competition amongst rivals was tough. But when firms outsource aspects of their business, they cease competing head-to-head, as the actual competition grows to include more players, Liu said.
“Once more businesses are involved, even if firms become more customer-focused, if their suppliers don’t cooperate, they can’t lower prices,” he said.
“So firms lose the incentive to become consumer-centric and competitive. And the reason why that happens is that outsourcing softens the competition among rival firms.”
“Some U.S. businesses may outsource to Canada, where the cost-savings are insignificant. Why do firms want to do that? One potential reason is to soften the competition among competing firms, which has the effect of keeping prices artificially higher than they should be,” he said.
Liu concluded that lawmakers have to consider policies that would facilitate open competition between firms and incentivize satisfying consumers.
“For public policymakers, it’s just another negative effect of outsourcing,” he said.
“They need to consider not only the Americans who are losing their jobs because of it, but also the consumers who are being gouged.”
The study will appear in the journal Management Science. (ANI)
- Online sales could reduce prices, but also limit choices - Nov 03, 2009
- Coca Cola not to increase prices in India - Sep 26, 2011
- Apple in price-fixing probe - Dec 07, 2011
- Global garment factories leaving China - Mar 28, 2012
- Jet fuel price cut by Rs.622 a kilolitre - Dec 31, 2011
- ITC, Ruchi Soya among top 50 fastest growing consumer companies - Apr 26, 2011
- European lawmakers bat for outsourcing to India - Nov 03, 2010
- India's IT professionals upset with Obama - May 05, 2009
- Hindustan Unilever's third quarter net profit down 1.8 percent - Jan 25, 2011
- Economic survey bats for FDI in multi-brand retail - Mar 15, 2012
- Obama stand on outsourcing is politics, says US expert - May 05, 2009
- India, China to see growth in BPO sector by 2015 - Aug 22, 2011
- Amazon patents procedure that will allow recipients to avoid unwanted gifts - Dec 28, 2010
- Microsoft to invest around $2.5 billion in Indonesia - Jan 22, 2011
- Fresh petrol price hike of Rs.1.80 per litre - Nov 03, 2011
Tags: canada, consensus, consumers, displacement, economist, frank liu, industry rivals, job, jobs, marketplace, profits, rajeev, rival firms, third party, two ways, tyagi, university of california, university of california at irvine, university of illinois