Luxury brands got India strategy wrong, says expert
March 25th, 2009 - 7:19 pm ICT by IANS ( 1 comment )
New Delhi, March 25 (IANS) Global luxury brand owners who have set up shop in India to tap the growing affluent class seem to have gone wrong in estimating the break-even point, says the man who brought labels such as Gucci to the country.
“Luxury brand owners went wrong in their estimate of returns. For example, brand owners estimated they would clock $1,000 worth of sales per store square feet, while in reality, they could only manage about $500,” Murjani group chairman Mohan Murjani, who brought a host of top fashion houses to India, said here Wednesday.
India’s rapidly growing high-end retail market is expected to increase from the around $3.5 billion in 2008 to $30 billion by 2015.
Murjani, in an address at a conclave on the luxury sector, said “franchisors” (brand owners) had pegged gross margins at about $500 per square feet, while it was found later that margins were half of that.
“Brand owners kept $100 as markdown (discounts) while they had to shell out as much as $125, this brought down the net margin from an estimated $400 to $125,” he said.
The head of the Murjani group, which has helped develop the Tommy Hilfiger label and has exclusive distribution agreements with the likes of Gucci, Jimmy Choo, Calvin Klein and FCUK, said luxury brands entering India expected profits from day-one while their Indian partners invested but totted up losses.
“There was an imbalance in partnerships between franchisors and franchisees. Agreements should be equally beneficial or at the least fairly beneficial,” Murjani said.
Maintaining that many investments were ill-timed, he said a lot of brands came when rentals were sky high. “That coupled with low sales drove down margins. Rentals have started coming down but one needs to have patience in India,” he added.
Murjani also chided foreign fashion and luxury brands for charging more in India because of the high duties on luxury items.
“Luxury product buyers travel across the world. There is no reason he will buy a product at 20-25 percent higher price than abroad.”
- Kidswear spells big business in India - Nov 17, 2011
- Indian designers unfazed by Hermes sari plans - Oct 16, 2011
- Get Stylish With Tommy Hilfiger Spring/Summer Watch Collection - Jun 04, 2010
- Mercedes-Benz sells 90 C-class cars' to Carzonrent - Jul 18, 2011
- 'Gucci' Fiat 500 unveiled at Milan Fashion Week - Feb 25, 2011
- 1,000 fake luxury goods seized in China - Sep 30, 2011
- Good times ahead in 2011 for Indian retailers, says Fitch - Jan 12, 2011
- Rachel Zoe's vintage pieces lost in transit - Jan 01, 2012
- Macys Unveils Its Black Friday Offers Finally - Nov 17, 2010
- Sarah Burton launches second McQueen collection - Jan 20, 2011
- Designerwear show affecting local business in Goa? - Dec 10, 2011
- JLo, Anthony's clothing line to go ahead - Jul 20, 2011
- Tommy Hilfiger to invest in Kors? - Jun 30, 2011
- Gucci launches limited edition bracelet for a cause (With Image) - Apr 24, 2011
- Indians prefer shopping for luxury items abroad, say experts - Mar 26, 2009
Tags: break even point, conclave, country luxury, distribution agreements, fashion houses, fcuk, gross margins, group chairman, india strategy, indian partners, jimmy choo, luxury brand, luxury brands, luxury items, luxury product, markdown, mohan murjani, murjani group, retail market, worl
June 21st, 2010 at 5:17 pm
Indian consumers buying luxury goods from abroad:
Don’t they pay the duties while they get the goods in India along with them?
What about after sales and services?
I guess the way luxury brands are retailed elsewhere is quite different from India…we hardly have the luxury infrastructure developed here and even if it is there the ‘walk and shop’ culture - (as we see in the high streets of London) is not observed here.