Focus on ‘good’ conduct, not weight of air hostesses: Supreme Court
April 24th, 2009 - 7:54 pm ICT by IANSNew Delhi, April 24 (IANS) The Supreme Court Friday made apparent its disapproval of air hostesses being dismissed for being overweight and said passengers would be happier if the focus was on their demeanour.
“All the passengers will be happy if your air hostesses are good with them instead of (your adopting) this approach,” observed a bench of Justices Tarun Chatterjee and H.L. Dattu while hearing a bunch of lawsuits by a group of 13 Indian air hostesses.
“I also tried to reduce my weight but I failed,” remarked Justice Chatterjee, disapproving of the move to dismiss the air hostesses for their failure to cut flab.
The air hostesses, some dismissed from service and others divested of flight duty and grounded for putting on ‘excessive’ weight, have approached the court challenging the company’s decision.
They have come to the court also challenging the Delhi High Court’s verdict of June 4, 2008, which upheld the policy of the state-run Indian Airlines, now known as Indian after its merger with Air India.
Counsel for the dismissed air hostesses Sheela Joshi and others, Arvind Sharma, pleaded that they be protected from dismissal while the lawsuit was being heard.
However, the court refused to give them relief despite according them a sympathetic ear.
“We cannot help you at this stage. But we will try to help you at the final stage,” said Justice Chatterjee, refusing to accede to Sharma’s plea that it should restrain the airlines from dismissing any of the 6,000-odd air hostesses on the grounds of being overweight.
“What they are going to do with other air hostesses, we do not know,” pleaded Sharma.
As the court wanted to hear the government’s view on the matter, Additional Solicitor General Gopal Subramaniam defended the policy saying: “We have given them four years to knock off a few pounds.”
Subramaniam told the court that the government “dispensed with their services” only in terms of the contractual agreement with them, which stipulated certain physical parameters as per international conventions.
“Please knock off a few pounds… Please knock off a few pounds. We had been pushing the deadlines for four years, but they failed,” said Subramanian.
The court adjourned the matter to August.
- Indian asked to explain why 'overweight' air hostesses grounded - Sep 19, 2008
- Indian Airlines sacks overweight air hostess, court asks why? - Jan 11, 2010
- Air India management can alter policy for workmen: Apex court - Nov 19, 2011
- Agnivesh should weigh his words: Supreme Court - Nov 08, 2011
- Air India sacks 10 'overweight' air hostesses - Jan 05, 2009
- Mask institute's logo, court tells 'Dum Maaro Dum' makers - Apr 21, 2011
- Court orders Air India to reinstate air hostess - Sep 18, 2010
- Jet Airways aborts flight after smoke in tyre - Feb 17, 2011
- Air India cancels 150 flights as pilots' strike continues (Lead) - Apr 30, 2011
- Stafon Johnson Files Lawsuit Against USC - Jan 25, 2011
- Defiant Nepal Airlines rats on Air India, other peers - Sep 08, 2011
- Court stays Air India pilots' strike that grounded 50 flights (Roundup) - Apr 27, 2011
- Relief for kin of crash victims: Air India plea rejected - Jul 09, 2011
- Supreme Court dismisses plea by retired judge - Nov 04, 2011
- Air India pilots strike: Stand off continues, 100 flights cancelled - Apr 29, 2011
Tags: air hostesses, air india, april 24, arvind sharma, being overweight, chatterjee, delhi high court, demeanour, disapproval, good conduct, gopal, indian airlines, joshi, lawsuits, New Delhi, plea, solicitor general, subramaniam, sympathetic ear, tarun
