Court upholds primacy of secured creditor in dues’ recovery
September 29th, 2010 - 7:18 pm ICT by IANSGandhinagar, Sep 29 (IANS) The Gujarat High Court has upheld the right of a secured creditor to a security for recovery of dues from a company as against an unsecured creditor, including a central government department.
A bench of Chief Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya and Justice K.M. Thaker ruled so while granting relief to Kotak Mahindra Bank whose bid to take possession of the assets of a company was opposed by the central excise and customs (CEC) department.
The Kotak Mahindra Bank had moved to take possession of the assets of a company after it failed to pay its dues. Even as it was in the process of doing so, the customs and excise department moved in to confiscate the plant machinery and other movable and immovable assets of the company.
Aggrieved by the decision of the central government department to confiscate the company’s assets, the bank sought the intervention of the high court.
The court, in its order Friday, clarified that the government cannot trifle the “out of court” remedy available to secured creditors while enforcing its security under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act.
The court held that the government cannot claim priority for settlement of its own debt over the secured creditors, exercising its rights under the securitization act.
The court ruled that the crown debt is an unsecured debt which may get a priority over another unsecured creditor but not over a secured creditor.
Granting relief to the bank to secure possession of the assets of the company, the court ruled that there was no specific provision in the Central Excise Act or the rules framed thereunder whereby the central government can claim “first charge”.
The petition was related to recovery of dues from Amod Petrochem Pvt. Ltd. and Amod Industries Ltd. The process for recovery was initiated in 2007.
- Court appoints provisional liquidator for Dunlop India - Mar 26, 2012
- District magistrate has to help secured creditor, rules court - Oct 26, 2010
- Bihar to confiscate BJP lawmaker's assets - Feb 04, 2012
- Dunlop India appeals against liquidator's appointment - Mar 29, 2012
- Bill to help banks recover dues to be introduced in winter session - Oct 13, 2011
- To track ill-gotten assets, Bihar ready to cross borders - Feb 16, 2012
- IT department freezes accounts of Mahindra Satyam - Mar 22, 2011
- Notice to government on smoking scenes in films (Lead) - Mar 16, 2012
- Publisher Of 'National Enquirer' Goes To Court For Bankruptcy Protection - Nov 18, 2010
- Madhya Pradesh to confiscate five officials' properties - Apr 04, 2012
- Zimbabwe's central bank to lay off 85 percent of staff - Aug 29, 2010
- Court orders confiscation of former DGP's assets - Feb 01, 2012
- Reliance Commercial Finance to move out of unsecured loans - Dec 06, 2011
- IT department freezes accounts of Mahindra Satyam (Lead) - Mar 22, 2011
- Another corrupt Bihar official's home to house school - Dec 04, 2011
Tags: central excise act, central excise and customs, central government, claim priority, customs and excise department, excise and customs, financial assets, government department, gujarat high court, industries ltd, interest act, kotak mahindra bank, plant machinery, primacy, secured creditor, secured creditors, securitization act, security interest, thaker, unsecured creditor