Court dismisses plea to make Tata, Ambani co-accused
July 13th, 2011 - 3:45 pm ICT by IANSNew Delhi, July 13 (IANS) The Delhi High Court Wednesday refused to hear a plea seeking direction to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to make industrialists Ratan Tata and Anil Ambani and lobbyist Niira Radia co-accused in the 2G telecom spectrum case.
“I will not pass any order. You argue at your own peril,” Justice Ajit Bharihoke said, asking Delhi-based journalist M. Furquan to withdraw his petition, which also sought similar directions on DMK chief M. Karunanidhi’s wife Dayalu Ammal.
Furquan then decided to withdraw the petiton but requested the court to give him the liberty to approach the Supreme Court.
The court slammed the petitioner saying that since the CBI was already investigating the case, the plea abuses the due process of the court. “I may impose a fine for filing a rubbish plea,” the judge warned Furquan.
“I will not allow you to approach anywhere. Withdraw your petition.”
Earlier, too, the special CBI court had rejected Furquan’s application seeking a similar order. Special Judge O.P. Saini said no third party would be permitted to “alter or interefere” with the on-going CBI probe in the case.
The court had noted that both the applications — one of them by Furquan and the other by a Delhi-based businessman — had failed to put forth any new evidence.
“Cognizance of the police case has already been taken and no further investigation can be ordered by the court at the instance of third parties, who are not even remotely connected with the issue,” the court had said.
“The police case cannot be altered beyond recognition at the instance of third parties, whose motives are unknown and (who) are also not in possession of any new evidence,” the court said and even imposed a fine of Rs.10,000 each on the petitioners.
“The applications are not only devoid of substance but contrary to law and deserve to be dismissed with heavy cost as applications after applications of this nature are being filed by third parties, resulting into loss of precious time of the court.”
- Plea to make Tata, Ambani 2G case co-accused rejected - Nov 23, 2011
- Court rejects pleas to make Anil Ambani, Ratan Tata 2G co-accused - Jun 02, 2011
- Cineyug director Morani seeks anticipatory bail - May 02, 2011
- Why isn't Dayalu Ammal charged in 2G scam, asks BJP - Apr 25, 2011
- 2G: High court dismisses honchos' plea (Lead) - Feb 14, 2012
- Frivolous plea against PM costs lawyer Rs.1 lakh - Aug 30, 2011
- UP foodgrain scam: Apex court seeks CBI's response - Mar 14, 2012
- Supreme Court to hear Kanimozhi, Sharad Kumar bail pleas Monday - Jun 12, 2011
- One of corporate executives co-accused in 2G case faints in court - May 04, 2011
- Unhappy DMK to meet Wednesday, Congress says alliance stable (Roundup) - Apr 26, 2011
- 2G scam: Bail pleas of five corporate honchos rejected (Lead) - May 23, 2011
- 2G case: Delhi High Court adjourns pleas of Balwa, Aggarwal - Jan 07, 2012
- Kanimozhi, Sharad Kumar's bail order reserved (Second Lead) - May 30, 2011
- 2G case: Supreme Court to hear honchos' bail pleas - Aug 28, 2011
- Justice Ajit Bharihoke retires - Oct 15, 2011
Tags: 2g, ajit, ambani, cbi court, cbi probe, central bureau of investigation, cognizance, delhi high court, due process, industrialists, lobbyist, m karunanidhi, new evidence, petitioner, petitioners, petiton, police case, radia, saini, special judge