British royal family told to cut expenses
October 9th, 2010 - 3:01 pm ICT by IANS
London, Oct 9 (IANS) The British royal family have been told to slash spending on palaces and travel by about 25 percent, a media report said Saturday.
The Whitehall officials said they expect the royal family to share the burden of budget cuts in the toughest review for a generation, due Oct 20, Daily Express reported.
The Queen’s annual Civil List payment, for performing her duties as head of state, has already been frozen at 7.9 million pounds (about $12 million), while a wider review of royal funding is conducted.
But the royal family’s two other main sources of state funding, 22 million pounds for palace maintenance and travel, have been earmarked for cuts over the next three years.
The cuts, due to come into force in April next year, may mean the Queen and other royals have to undertake fewer official duties in the run-up to her Diamond Jubilee year in 2012.
An official at the Department for Culture, which pays 15 million pounds a year for palaces, said: “All our bodies that we pay grants to have been told to expect reductions in the region of 25 percent and the royal household is certainly not exempt from that.”
Officials at the Department for Transport, which granted the royal family 7.3 million pounds last year for official travel, although only five million pounds of that was spent and the rest returned, were equally adamant the royal family would be hit by cuts.
However, both departments will not determine the exact size of the budget reductions facing the royals until they are told the lump sums they are receiving from the Treasury.
Buckingham Palace puts the annual cost of the monarchy to the taxpayer at 38.2 million pounds but that figure does not include security and other costs which put the bill closer to 180 million pounds a year.
Palace officials have been dipping into a reserve fund of 15.2 million pounds to bolster the Civil List but at the current rate of expenditure, that will be gone by 2012.
Prime Minister David Cameron and his Chancellor George Osborne are both said to be more critical of royal spending in private than many other ministers.
In October last year while still in opposition, Osborne indicated he expected the royal household to keep costs under control.
- Britain's spending cuts to affect queen's purse - Jun 22, 2010
- Recession-hit Queen 'to go bankrupt in 2 years' - Jul 06, 2010
- Cost of maintaining British royal family drops - Jul 05, 2010
- Britain to cut 500,000 public sector jobs - Oct 20, 2010
- New Brit Govt. to ask Queen to take 'at least' five percent pay cut - May 16, 2010
- "Broke" Queen seeks multi-million pound pay-raise - May 31, 2010
- Britain unveils annual budget - Mar 21, 2012
- British queen's pay rise ruled out - Dec 06, 2011
- Spain's king earns 244,000 pounds a year - Dec 29, 2011
- Department of Homeland Security - efficient bureaucratic behemoth or costly edifice - Mar 02, 2011
- Britain introduces 40 bn pound austerity measures - Jun 22, 2010
- Brit daily wins right to disclose Queen's finances - Dec 21, 2009
- British MPs draw flak for defying austerity measures - Jan 03, 2011
- London Olympics likely to be under budget - Feb 29, 2012
- Prince Charles, Queen Elizabeth To Pay For Royal Wedding? - Nov 18, 2010
Tags: british royal family, buckingham palace, budget cuts, budget reductions, cost of the monarchy, current rate, daily express, diamond jubilee, due oct, exact size, grants, head of state, lump sums, minis, official travel, palaces, royal household, royals, treasury, whitehall