Assocham for tax sops to promote SEZsApril 22nd, 2012 - 9:50 pm ICT by IANS
Bangalore, April 22 (IANS) Tax exemptions and related benefits were imperative to promote special economic zones (SEZs) across the country as they account for 30 percent of total exports and provide employment opportunities, industry lobby Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India (Assocham) said Sunday.
“Anomalies in every budget vis-ŕ-vis promised tax breaks and stimulus for SEZs might discourage investors owing to poor implementation of intended legislation thereby hurting the credibility of the SEZ policy,” Assocham president R.N. Dhoot said in a statement here.
For instance, the proposal to levy 18.5 percent minimum alternate tax (MAT) and 15 percent dividend distribution tax on SEZ developers in the budget for this fiscal (2012-13) has raised serious concerns on the SEZ tax policy.
“SEZ developers and investors are in a fix over the stability of policy, especially on taxes and land acquisition policy thereby compelling them to revisit their decision to continue with their business in the key sector,” Dhoot observed.
Highlighting the vital role of state governments, he said each state must have specific plan in place for SEZs as it takes about six-nine months to commence construction work after notification.
“SEZs must be earmarked on barren, wastelands, infertile land and soils with least potential for farming. The state governments should provide basic infrastructure such as power, connectivity, water and labour has to be provided to encourage SEZ projects in the rural belt than in urban areas,” Dhoot added.
In light of controversies and protracted legal battles on land acquisition, the apex industry body sought an effective rehabilitation policy for landowners like farmers and displaced people with shareholding in the projects to reap long-term benefits and at least one member of the family parting with the land be trained for a secure job in the SEZ.
“Long gestation period and huge investment requirements are detrimental factors in setting up SEZs in a time-bound manner. Besides, retrograde provisions like re-notification of SEZs as per state specific SEZ Act after notification by the central government is a stumbling block in the operation of many SEZs,” Dhoot lamented.
Seeking a pro-active role by the state governments in drafting separate labour laws for SEZs, which are deemed foreign territories, Dhoot said the SEZs should be allowed to charge customs duty equivalent to the duty exemption given on import of raw materials.
The apex body also advocated a new policy to encourage multi-product SEZs on public-private partnership model and for thrust areas of infrastructure.
- Unfavourable levies hit Indian manufacturing: FICCI - Aug 12, 2012
- Making housing affordable: Realty industry needs budget boost (Comment) - Feb 26, 2012
- Some positives in budget, says India Inc; displeased with taxes - Mar 16, 2012
- No clear Pakistani policy on terror: Daily - Sep 05, 2012
- Bengal should set up nuclear plants, SEZs: Assocham - Nov 07, 2011
- Realty industry has little to cheer from budget (Comment) - Mar 18, 2012
- MAT imposed to stop tax distortion: Official - Apr 13, 2011
- Asia's largest aerospace hub near Bangalore soon - Jun 04, 2012
- Panel suggests national media policy, regulation of media education - Jul 26, 2012
- Pranab Mukherjee: Politician nonpareil becomes constitutional guardian (Profile) - Jun 15, 2012
- Revised SEZ policy in 3-4 weeks: Commerce secretary - Jul 26, 2012
- Land acquisition law must avert conflict, push development(Comment) - Jul 14, 2011
- We can't change our anti-SEZ stand: Mamata - Apr 27, 2012
- $2 bn aerospace, defence exports by India in 2011-12: Assocham - Jan 27, 2012
- ASSOCHAM suggests measures to boost corporate investments - Aug 03, 2010
Tags: acquisition policy, assocham, chambers of commerce, chambers of commerce and industry, controversies, dividend distribution, economic zones, gestation period, industry of india, investment requirements, land acquisition, legal battles, member of the family, poor implementation, rehabilitation policy, serious concerns, shareholding, state governments, tax exemptions, tax sops