Apex court sore over neglect of building workers’ welfare
September 10th, 2010 - 9:01 pm ICT by IANSNew Delhi, Sep 10 (IANS) The Supreme Court Friday slammed the central government and states for their failure to implement two almost 15-year-old laws on the regulation of working conditions and welfare of construction industry labourers.
The court expressed its displeasure at the total indifference of the central and state governments in implementing the Building and other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996 and the Building and other Construction Workers’ Welfare Cess Act, 1996.
Under the Building and other Construction Workers’ Welfare Cess Act, 1996 a welfare board was to be set up in all states to collect one percent of the building plan from the building agency as cess.
The money went to a fund for carrying out welfare schemes including health, medical care, pension, housing loan and the education of the children of the workers engaged in building and construction industry.
If the state governments and the union territories were not implementing the laws aimed for the welfare of the workers then what was the central government doing, asked an apex court bench of Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia, Justice K.S. Radhakrishnan and Justice Swatanter Kumar while hearing a public interest litigation (PIL).
After expressing its anguish, the court said that Maharashtra has 30 lakh construction workers and it has not set up a welfare board as mandated under the act.
“We also don’t know why the centre has not issued directions to such states,” the court said, describing this as “unfortunate”.
The court asked the central government to call for necessary details from states and union territories about the steps they have taken for the implementation of the statute for the welfare of building workers and in pursuance of the apex court directions of January 2010.
The court asked the central advisory committee (CAC) to file a status report on the steps it had taken for the implementation of the welfare law for building workers.
The court said that it would continue monitoring the setting up of the welfare boards and their functioning.
In the course of the hearing, senior counsel Colin Gonsalves told the court that more than Rs.4,000 crore have been collected by way of cess but the same was not properly put to use for the welfare of the workers.
The court was told that 14 years after the enactment of the law Maharashtra, Goa, Nagaland, Mizoram, Sikkim, Lakshadweep and Daman and Diu have not set up welfare boards.
In five other state, the welfare boards were non-functional. In other states, the boards set up were either not registered or were discharging minimal activities, the court was informed.
- Workers' welfare boards' accounts to be audited: Apex court (Lead) - Feb 08, 2012
- Rs.2,837 crore collected for construction workers' welfare - Aug 19, 2010
- Workers' welfare boards to face government auditor: Apex court - Feb 08, 2012
- Apex court demands action on building workers' welfare laws - Jan 13, 2009
- What are you doing to implement juvenile justice act, asks court - Sep 24, 2010
- Court monitors camps for welfare of Games' workers - Aug 04, 2010
- 'Not a rupee spent by Delhi government on labour welfare'(Lead) - Jun 18, 2009
- 'Rs.20 bn labour welfare fund, not a rupee spent' - Jun 18, 2009
- Set up child rights, justice panels 'forthwith': apex court - Jan 22, 2010
- Financial benefits for labourers in Delhi hiked - Feb 07, 2012
- Apex court spared neither holy cows, nor corrupt in 2011 (2011 in Retrospect) - Dec 28, 2011
- Apex court puts sealing in Delhi on hold, to examine law - Jan 03, 2012
- Supreme Court stays newspaper wage board recommendations - Jul 18, 2011
- Look into nurses' grievance, apex court tells government - Dec 09, 2011
- Implement juvenile justice act: Supreme Court - Sep 24, 2010
Tags: apex court, central advisory committee, central government, construction industry, construction workers, court bench, displeasure, housing loan, kapadia, lakh, maharashtra, necessary details, pil, public interest litigation, s radhakrishnan, service act, state governments, union territories, welfare board, welfare schemes