Apex court slams ‘inefficient’ national carrier
April 4th, 2011 - 11:27 pm ICT by IANSNew Delhi, April 4 (IANS) The Supreme Court Monday was unsparing in its criticism of the “lord and master” government for its backing of the national air carrier, which is “lowest” in efficiency and has the “worst reputation”.
The apex court bench of Justice R.V. Raveendran and Justice A.K. Patnaik said this in the course of hearing by private air carriers challenging the government’s decision asking them to enter into a memorandum of understanding providing for the handing of ground handling facilities by the national carrier.
“The (private) air carriers which are so competent, they (government) want to bring them to the level of incompetence,” the court said.
As Solicitor General Gopal Subramanium told the court that “We have advised all the operators. They have to come under MoU,” the court remarked “you (national carrier) are a competitive service, you are the lowest (in efficiency).”
When the solicitor general said that ground handling facilities was a specialised service, the court said that being a regulator you have a right to interfere. “What is going on smoothly, you want to disturb even that.”
Coming down heavily on the national carrier, the court said, “You are going to give it to a carrier which has the worst reputation. We know which air carrier waits for VIPs (beyond their departure time).”
“You are taking away (ground handling operation) from and giving it to joint venture company. (It is like) ruining other operators to the level of inefficiency.” “It is only to profit somebody,” the court observed.
“You are a regulator. Good governance and bad governance is in your domain. But sometimes in the name of good governance you bring bad governance,” the court said.
The court asked that if bringing ground handling facilities under the national air carrier was on the consideration of security, then why was it being confined to four international airports and not being extended to all.
Appearing for the private air carriers, senior counsel Mukul Rohtagi said their efficiency level was way ahead of the national carrier and the new arrangement would make their service inefficient. He said that security was just a ploy to take away their business and give it to a JV company having international partners.
The court has given three weeks’ time to the government and private operators to file their counters and replies and listed the mater for April 25 for further hearing.
- With Maharaja a pauper, is it time to sell Air India? - May 08, 2011
- Air India cancels 150 flights as pilots continue strike (Second Lead) - May 01, 2011
- Corruption alleged in Air India-Singapore firm deal - Nov 22, 2011
- Air India cancels 150 flights as pilots' strike continues (Lead) - Apr 30, 2011
- Private airlines to have global traffic rights - Mar 14, 2012
- Turkish firm investing over $100 mn on Mumbai, Delhi airports - Jan 30, 2011
- Private Indian airlines allowed to expand overseas services - Feb 14, 2012
- Government: Press release issued by army (Lead) - May 07, 2012
- 90 percent of Air India flights crippled, management urges talks (Roundup) - May 01, 2011
- Air India's turnaround plan approved (Roundup) - Apr 12, 2012
- Haj subsidy to end in 10 years, rules Supreme Court (Roundup) - May 08, 2012
- Why was TRAI silent for two years: Apex court on 2G - Dec 01, 2010
- Better deals in offing for those flying abroad - Mar 06, 2011
- Kingfisher tops in unused flight slots, says Ravi - Nov 30, 2011
- Air cargo operations launched from Ojhar airport - Sep 20, 2011
Tags: air carriers, apex court, competitive service, court bench, departure time, good governance, gopal, inefficiency, international airports, joint venture company, master government, memorandum of understanding, national air carrier, national carrier, private air, raveendran, solicitor general, specialised service, subramanium, vips