Apex court quashes adulteration case against Pepsi
November 18th, 2010 - 10:26 pm ICT by IANSNew Delhi, Nov 18 (IANS) The Supreme Court Thursday set aside a Kerala High court judgment and quashed the prosecution of Pepsico India Holding Private Limited based on complaints alleging presence of pesticide residue in its soft drink.
The apex court bench of Justice Altamas Kabir, Justice Cyriac Joseph and Justice Deepak Verma allowed the appeal by the company and said that it raised many questions on the maintainability of the prosecution launched against it.
The entire controversy arose out of the fact that no specific tolerance limit had been prescribed for sweetened carbonated water under law and it was, therefore, presumed that trace of any insecticide would amount to adulteration of the final product, the judgment said.
The court said in the absence of any “prescribed and validated method of analysis under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, a prosecution could have been launched against the soft drink manufacturers by relying on the methods prescribed by the directorate general of health services”.
The judgment said that the percentage of pesticides found in the sweetened carbonated water manufactured by Pepsico was within the tolerance limits that were subsequently prescribed in respect of such product under the anti-food adulteration law.
A food inspector of mobile vigilance inspected the premises of Pepsico’s associate Star Marketing in Ashoka Puram, under Kozhikode Municipal Corporation in Kerala, and sealed some bottles of the soft drink Oct 5, 2006.
On Nov 28, 2006, a public analyst who tested the Pepsi sample said that it contained residue of pesticide - Carbofuran - to the extent of 0.001 mg per litre.
It was concluded that the sample was, therefore, adulterated under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act.
Based on these findings, a magistrate in Kozhikode initiated proceedings against the Pepsico.
- Adulteration case against Pepsi set aside - Oct 25, 2010
- No banned pesticides in Delhi vegetables, court told - Jul 20, 2011
- Gujarat government pulled up for delay in food adulteration cases - Dec 13, 2010
- 80 percent of food adulteration accused walk free in Gujarat - Jan 03, 2011
- No harmful adulterants in Delhi milk, court told - Jan 25, 2012
- Banned pesticides: Court wants report by Aug 17 (Lead) - May 01, 2012
- No harmful adulterants in Delhi milk, court told (Lead) - Jan 25, 2012
- Panel to check banned pesticides set up, court told - Mar 21, 2012
- Ketchup adulteration case against Nestle set aside - Oct 28, 2010
- New tool helps detect pesticide presence in a jiffy - Dec 16, 2011
- CSE condemns industry inclusion in apex food body - Aug 08, 2009
- Panel on soft drinks will be re-constituted, apex court told (Second Lead) - Feb 08, 2011
- Panel on soft drinks will be re-constituted, apex court told (Lead) - Feb 08, 2011
- 'Diet' soft drinks linked to premature births - Aug 19, 2010
- Junk food: High Court seeks guidelines - Jan 11, 2012
Tags: apex court, carbofuran, carbonated water, court bench, court judgment, deepak verma, directorate general, food inspector, insecticide, kabir, kerala high court, maintainability, pepsico, pesticide residue, prevention of food adulteration, puram, soft drink manufacturers, star marketing, tolerance limit, tolerance limits