Ambani family pact not binding on RIL: Counsel
November 11th, 2009 - 4:12 pm ICT by IANSNew Delhi, Nov 11 (IANS) Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) Wednesday sought to impress upon the Supreme Court that the family pact between the promoter brothers — Mukesh and Anil Ambani — brokered by their mother Kokilaben, was not binding on the company.
Proceeding with his arguments in the Krishna-Godavari gas dispute, RIL counsel Harish Salve also questioned the legality of a part of an earlier ruling of the Bombay High Court and said private pacts between two people cannot bind a corporate entity and its shareholders.
“Admittedly, this document was not placed before the RIL board. Admittedly, it was not mentioned before the court. It was not shown to the RIL shareholders,” argued Salve, questioning the legal validity of the family pact on his client.
He was placing his arguments before a three-judge bench comprising Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan, Justice B. Sudershan Reddy and Justice P. Sathasivam, which has been hearing the matter.
The dispute is over the supply of 28 million units of natural gas for 17 years at $2.34 per unit to Anil Ambani-led Reliance Natural Resources (RNRL) from the gas fields off the Andhra Pradesh coast, awarded to Mukesh Ambani-led RIL.
The price, tenure and quantity were all based on a family re-organisation pact in 2005 but RIL subsequently said it could only sell the gas for $4.20 per unit, as this was the price, the company claimed, that was fixed by the government.
Salve said the family pact had envisaged it would only serve as a guiding document to arrive at the suitable arrangement for gas supply and that the two brothers would arrive at a suitable agreement.
It does not matter even if the RIL chairman had signed the pact, said Salve, adding that the RIL board never approved it.
- Ambani family pact not binding on RIL: Counsel (Lead) - Nov 11, 2009
- 'Anil Ambani entitled to earlier rights in RIL if de-merger fails' (Lead) - Nov 25, 2009
- Didn't Mukesh know of Ambani family pact, queries apex court (Lead) - Nov 12, 2009
- 'Anil Ambani entitled to earlier rights in RIL if de-merger fails' - Nov 25, 2009
- Didn't Mukesh know of Ambani family pact, asks apex court - Nov 12, 2009
- Apex court reserves verdict on Krishna-Godavari gas row (Lead) - Dec 18, 2009
- Krishna-Godavari gas not for Dadri alone: RNRL - Dec 03, 2009
- No ambiguity in gas price, quantity and tenure: RNRL (Second Lead) - Nov 24, 2009
- Court can't impose family pact on shareholders: RIL - Nov 17, 2009
- Reliance Industries admits gas policy was not notified (Second Lead) - Oct 22, 2009
- RNRL ends argument on gas dispute with plea for comprehensive solution - Dec 16, 2009
- RNRL chief Anil Ambani meets Prime Minister - May 12, 2010
- No ambiguity in gas price, quantity and tenure: RNRL (Lead) - Nov 24, 2009
- RNRL seeks bankable agreement on Krishna-Godavari gas - Dec 15, 2009
- RIL offers to withdraw affidavits of directors on Ambani pact - Nov 13, 2009
Tags: 17 years, andhra pradesh, bombay high court, chief justice, corporate entity, family pact, godavari, k g balakrishnan, krishna, legal validity, mukesh and anil ambani, New Delhi, pacts, promoter, reliance industries, reliance industries ltd, reliance industries ltd ril, salve, suitable arrangement, two brothers