Dictionary mistake goes unnoticed for 99 yearsMay 12th, 2010 - 11:11 am ICT by IANS
Melbourne, May 12 (IANS) Those who swear by the dictionary for uses of words may need to cross check as the meaning explained in the bible of lexicon may not be error free.
The error may be slight, but it’s an error nonetheless, said Stephen Hughes, a physicist with Queensland University of Technology, who spotted a 99-year-old mistake in the Oxford English Dictionary.
Hughes claims he has discovered that the dictionary’s definition of the word “siphon” has been incorrect since 1911.
The definition in the Oxford dictionary and many other dictionaries stated that atmospheric pressure was the force behind a siphon. But in fact it is the force of gravity at work.
“It is gravity that moved the fluid in a siphon, with the water in the longer downward arm pulling the water up the shorter arm,” Hughes was quoted as saying by The Sydney Morning Herald.
Hughes alerted the dictionary’s revision team, which had just completed revising words beginning with the letter “R”.
“I thought, ‘Oh good, just in time,’ because S is next,” he said.
The physicist discovered the error after viewing an enormous siphon in South Australia, transferring the equivalent of 4000 Olympic swimming pools from the Murray River system into the depleted Lake Bonney.
“I thought this example would make a great education paper … but in my background research I discovered there was much contention about the definition of the word ’siphon’,” Hughes said.
“I found that almost every dictionary contained the same misconception that atmospheric pressure, not gravity, pushed liquid through the tube of a siphon”.
The dictionary’s review team has agreed to re-examine the definition.
Hughes is now determined to set the record straight, and says the issue should not be taken lightly.
“We would all have an issue if the dictionary defined a koala as a species of bear, or a rose as a tulip,” said Hughes, who has now turned his attention towards dictionaries in other languages.
“I would like to know if the siphon misconception exists in dictionaries in other languages, and also if there are incorrect definitions of siphon in school text books,” he added.
- Physicist corrects 99-year-old error in Oxford English Dictionary! - May 11, 2010
- Indian-origin man shocked to find transvestism termed as 'abnormal desire' - Dec 21, 2010
- Bilingual dictionaries to promote India's mother tongues - Mar 12, 2012
- 'Refudiate' just a typo, Palin now says - Dec 29, 2010
- Vuvuzela, chill pill, bromance enter Oxford Dictionary of English - Aug 19, 2010
- Internet words 'bloggable' and 'scareware' enter Oxford Dictionary - Feb 24, 2011
- 'Separate' - the most commonly misspelt word in English language - Aug 07, 2010
- Furgling, Dringle, Fumb - from Oxford Dictionary's 'non words' vault - Aug 07, 2010
- PM promises youth, children access to quality books - Mar 21, 2012
- 10 jailed for pirating dictionaries - Jan 05, 2011
- Salwa Judum never existed: Raman Singh - May 04, 2012
- Koalas' loud noises made by human-style voice boxes - Sep 29, 2011
- Graphic symbol for love is first to be added to Oxford English Dictionary - Mar 25, 2011
- Sexting is official, you may retweet it - Aug 18, 2011
- Snoop Dogg wants to release his own dictionary - Jun 30, 2011
Tags: atmospheric pressure, background research, education paper, force of gravity, great education, koala, lake bonney, misconception, morning herald, murray river, old mistake, olympic swimming, oxford dictionary, oxford english dictionary, physicist, queensland university of technology, south australia, stephen hughes, swimming pools, sydney morning herald